Compare to
Fellow
Instead of improving how you run meetings, In Parallel makes every meeting add to a shared record.
Where Fellow helps teams have better conversations, In Parallel makes sure those conversations drive execution.
In short
Fellow suits team leads who want better meeting agendas, structured notes and action-item tracking, with one-way sync of action items to tools like Jira or Asana. A ticket is not a decision record, so organisations that need decisions, owners and risks kept across several teams, with a source and a status, should choose In Parallel.
Updated
In Parallel isn't another meeting or project tool — it's the AI context layer: it gives the AI you already use your team's decisions, with the source behind every answer. Choosing an AI context layer →
What are the key differences?
From the meeting room to execution intelligence.
From meeting notes to execution intelligence
Fellow produces structured meeting notes with action items and agendas. It is a productivity tool for meetings themselves. In Parallel treats meetings as a data source for something larger: a shared record of decisions, owners and risks that every meeting adds to.
From action items to decision records
Fellow can push action items to Jira or Asana. But a Jira ticket is not a decision. In Parallel records what was decided, by whom, with a status (proposed, reviewing, approved, rejected), and links it to the meeting it came from. Risks and open questions stay open until someone resolves them.
From individual productivity to organisational coordination
Fellow helps individuals run better meetings. In Parallel helps organizations stay coordinated across teams, projects, and leadership levels. The value compounds as more teams and meetings add to the same shared record.
From manual status updates to pages that keep up
With Fellow, managers still need to manually pull information from notes into dashboards and plans. In Parallel’s page agent appends what changed to the workspace pages a meeting touched, and a nightly pass rereads them, so the roadmap or decision log is current without anyone rewriting it.
When to choose Fellow
- Your primary goal is better meeting agendas and notes
- You want action item tracking for individual contributors
- Your teams work independently and don't need cross-team coordination
- Meeting productivity is the main bottleneck, not execution tracking
When to choose In Parallel
- You need a record of decisions and owners that stays current without manual upkeep
- Managers spend too many hours on status updates and alignment
- Multiple teams need to stay coordinated across projects
- You want Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot to answer from what your meetings decided
Frequently asked questions
Can In Parallel replace Fellow for meeting notes?
Yes. In Parallel captures meeting decisions, action items, and ownership changes automatically -- just like Fellow. But it goes further by keeping those as a shared record across meetings and teams, readable by your AI tools over MCP. You get meeting notes and a decision record in one system.
Does In Parallel integrate with the same tools as Fellow?
Fellow pushes action items one way into tools like Jira and Asana. In Parallel takes a different route: it keeps the record itself and serves it over MCP to Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and Cursor, and the Business plan includes up to five app integrations. Ask us about the specific tools you use.
Is In Parallel more expensive than Fellow?
In Parallel is priced per user, from €29 / user / month, billed monthly with no commitment. It pays for itself by saving 6-8 hours per person per week on status updates, alignment meetings, and re-explaining decisions -- most teams see payback within the first week.
Who should use Fellow vs In Parallel?
Fellow is a strong choice if your primary goal is better meeting agendas, notes, and action item tracking for individual contributors and team leads. Choose In Parallel if you need a coordination layer that keeps decisions, owners and risks in one shared record -- especially across multiple teams or at the leadership level.
Price the knowledge, not the people.
41% of the work week goes to coordination. In Parallel gives it back.
Plans
Professional
€29
per user / month
120 Knowledge Units per user a day. For teams under 50 users: meeting notes, chat, pages and workspaces.
Business
€69
per user / month
250 Knowledge Units per user a day. Adds sharing: give people access to a workspace, with set access rights for what they can see. Up to 5 app integrations. Automations when released.
Enterprise
Custom
One annual price, invoiced in advance. From 50 users, everyone in the company on one contract: unlimited app integrations, SSO and a named contact.
Talk to sales →On request
Custom
Dedicated EU cloud, on-premises and professional services
Shared EU cloud is standard and included. Onboarding, trainings and the named contact are always included.
Talk to sales →- Billed monthly at list price, cancel any month — or prepay a year and save 20%.
- One plan for the whole company: moving up moves everyone. Every user who signs in has a seat, including clients added to a workspace; AI agents need none.
- Reads from your own AI tools over MCP are free within fair use. When the pool runs out, 1,000 KU top-ups for €250 are added automatically, up to a cap your admin sets.
Go beyond meeting notes.
See how In Parallel turns meeting conversations into a shared decision record. 30-minute demo.