Compare to
Fireflies.ai
Instead of transcribing your meetings, In Parallel turns them into execution.
Where Fireflies gives you a searchable record, In Parallel gives you what was decided and who owns it.
In short
Fireflies suits anyone who needs high-quality verbatim transcripts and a searchable meeting archive for documentation or compliance. Fireflies records what was said and can create tickets from action items, while In Parallel keeps decisions, owners and risks as a shared record with sources, so managers reconciling meeting outcomes across teams should choose In Parallel.
Updated
In Parallel isn't another meeting or project tool — it's the AI context layer: it gives the AI you already use your team's decisions, with the source behind every answer. Choosing an AI context layer →
What are the key differences?
Transcripts capture the past. Coordination shapes the future.
From transcript to execution context
Fireflies produces a searchable, timestamped transcript of every meeting. It is excellent at capturing what was said. In Parallel captures what matters for execution -- decisions, ownership changes, timeline shifts, and blocked items -- and keeps them as a record linked to the meeting they came from.
From ticket creation to a decision record
Fireflies can create Jira tickets from action items. But creating a ticket is not the same as recording a decision. In Parallel records what was decided, with a status and an owner, keeps risks and open questions open until resolved, and appends what changed to the workspace pages the meeting touched.
From meeting memory to organisational awareness
Fireflies gives you a record of past meetings that you can search. In Parallel gives you a current record of decisions, owners and open risks, added to by every meeting across teams and projects. One helps you remember. The other helps you deliver.
When to choose Fireflies.ai
- You need high-quality verbatim transcripts for compliance or documentation
- Your main need is searchable meeting archives
- You want a lightweight AI notetaker for any meeting participant
- Execution plan management is handled by a separate workflow
When to choose In Parallel
- You need meeting decisions kept as a record with owners and status
- Managers are spending hours manually reconciling meeting outcomes with project tools
- You want Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot to answer from what your meetings decided
- Your organization needs a coordination layer, not just a transcription tool
Frequently asked questions
Can In Parallel replace Fireflies.ai for meeting transcription?
Yes. In Parallel captures meeting conversations, decisions, and action items automatically. While Fireflies focuses on producing searchable transcripts, In Parallel goes further by keeping a shared record of decisions, owners and risks across meetings.
Does In Parallel offer the same transcription quality as Fireflies?
In Parallel captures meeting content with a focus on extracting decisions, ownership changes, and action items -- the elements that matter for execution. If your primary need is verbatim transcripts for compliance or legal purposes, Fireflies may be a better fit. If your goal is turning meeting conversations into execution, In Parallel is purpose-built for that.
How does In Parallel's tool integration differ from Fireflies?
Fireflies can create Jira tickets or push action items to project tools. In Parallel keeps the record itself: decisions, owners, risks and open questions, each linked to its meeting, served over MCP to Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot and Cursor. The Business plan includes up to five app integrations; ask us about the tools you use.
Is In Parallel suitable for large organizations with many meetings?
In Parallel is built for organizations where coordination across teams is the bottleneck. The more meetings and teams connected to the system, the more valuable it becomes -- because every meeting adds to the same shared record. This is where Fireflies' per-meeting approach reaches its limits.
Price the knowledge, not the people.
41% of the work week goes to coordination. In Parallel gives it back.
Plans
Professional
€29
per user / month
120 Knowledge Units per user a day. For teams under 50 users: meeting notes, chat, pages and workspaces.
Business
€69
per user / month
250 Knowledge Units per user a day. Adds sharing: give people access to a workspace, with set access rights for what they can see. Up to 5 app integrations. Automations when released.
Enterprise
Custom
One annual price, invoiced in advance. From 50 users, everyone in the company on one contract: unlimited app integrations, SSO and a named contact.
Talk to sales →On request
Custom
Dedicated EU cloud, on-premises and professional services
Shared EU cloud is standard and included. Onboarding, trainings and the named contact are always included.
Talk to sales →- Billed monthly at list price, cancel any month — or prepay a year and save 20%.
- One plan for the whole company: moving up moves everyone. Every user who signs in has a seat, including clients added to a workspace; AI agents need none.
- Reads from your own AI tools over MCP are free within fair use. When the pool runs out, 1,000 KU top-ups for €250 are added automatically, up to a cap your admin sets.
Go beyond transcripts.
See how In Parallel turns meeting conversations into execution. 30-minute demo.