Compare to
WorkBoard
Instead of aligning OKRs top-down, In Parallel captures what happens bottom-up.
Where WorkBoard tells you what the plan should be, In Parallel records what was actually decided in the meetings where the work happens.
In short
WorkBoard suits leadership teams that want to define and cascade OKRs top-down, with quarterly reviews and manual check-ins. WorkBoard shows what the plan should be, while In Parallel records what was actually decided in meetings, with owners, status and sources, so organisations that want that bottom-up record between reviews should choose In Parallel, or run both.
Updated
In Parallel isn't another meeting or project tool — it's the AI context layer: it gives the AI you already use your team's decisions, with the source behind every answer. Choosing an AI context layer →
What are the key differences?
From the plan to the reality.
From top-down alignment to bottom-up intelligence
WorkBoard starts at the top: define company OKRs, cascade them to teams, and track check-ins. This is valuable for strategic alignment. In Parallel starts at the bottom: capture what happens in meetings as decisions, owners and risks. This is valuable for seeing what is actually being decided between reviews.
From quarterly review cycles to continuous updates
WorkBoard's OKR model operates on review cycles -- typically quarterly. Between reviews, the system depends on manual check-ins to stay current. In Parallel adds to its record after every meeting, so a changed decision or a new risk shows up that afternoon, not at the next QBR.
From manual check-ins to captured decisions
WorkBoard requires team members to manually update OKR progress. In Parallel removes the write-up step for meetings. When a decision is made, ownership changes, or a timeline shifts, it is recorded with an owner and a status, and the workspace pages the meeting touched are updated.
From strategy tool to coordination layer
WorkBoard is a strategy execution platform -- it helps leadership define and track high-level objectives. In Parallel is a coordination layer -- it connects meetings, tools, and teams so the record reflects what is happening. They solve adjacent but different problems. Some organizations benefit from using both.
When to choose WorkBoard
- Your primary need is top-down OKR definition and cascading
- You want a framework for aligning leadership goals to team objectives
- Quarterly review cadences work well for your organization
- Manual OKR check-ins are acceptable for your teams
When to choose In Parallel
- You need to see what is being decided between review cycles
- Decisions change between reviews and no one hears until the next QBR
- You want meeting decisions recorded with owners and status, without a write-up
- Managers are overwhelmed with status reporting and manual check-ins
Frequently asked questions
Does In Parallel support OKR tracking like WorkBoard?
No. In Parallel does not track OKRs or goals. It captures what happens in meetings as decisions, owners, risks and open questions, so you can see what is actually being decided. You can keep using WorkBoard or another OKR framework alongside it.
Can In Parallel replace WorkBoard for strategy execution?
If your primary need is top-down OKR management and reporting, WorkBoard is purpose-built for that. If your problem is that decisions made between review cycles never reach anyone, In Parallel addresses that directly by recording them from every meeting, with an owner, a status and a source.
How does In Parallel handle strategic alignment without OKRs?
In Parallel keeps a shared record of decisions, ownership, risks, and dependencies from meetings, and workspace pages that update after each one. That record is the reference for what is happening. Whether you use OKRs, KPIs, or another framework, In Parallel keeps the execution layer honest.
Is In Parallel suitable for enterprises that already use WorkBoard?
Yes. In Parallel can complement WorkBoard by providing the bottom-up execution intelligence that top-down OKR platforms often miss. WorkBoard tracks what the plan should be; In Parallel records what was decided in the meetings in between, rather than waiting for the next quarterly review.
Price the knowledge, not the people.
41% of the work week goes to coordination. In Parallel gives it back.
Plans
Professional
€29
per user / month
120 Knowledge Units per user a day. For teams under 50 users: meeting notes, chat, pages and workspaces.
Business
€69
per user / month
250 Knowledge Units per user a day. Adds sharing: give people access to a workspace, with set access rights for what they can see. Up to 5 app integrations. Automations when released.
Enterprise
Custom
One annual price, invoiced in advance. From 50 users, everyone in the company on one contract: unlimited app integrations, SSO and a named contact.
Talk to sales →On request
Custom
Dedicated EU cloud, on-premises and professional services
Shared EU cloud is standard and included. Onboarding, trainings and the named contact are always included.
Talk to sales →- Billed monthly at list price, cancel any month — or prepay a year and save 20%.
- One plan for the whole company: moving up moves everyone. Every user who signs in has a seat, including clients added to a workspace; AI agents need none.
- Reads from your own AI tools over MCP are free within fair use. When the pool runs out, 1,000 KU top-ups for €250 are added automatically, up to a cap your admin sets.
See what's happening.
See how In Parallel gives you bottom-up execution intelligence. 30-minute demo.