In Parallel vs tl;dv, Meeting Recording vs Execution Intelligence

Compare to

tl;dv logo

tl;dv

Instead of recording and clipping your meetings, In Parallel extracts decisions and keeps them as a record.

Where tl;dv helps you revisit what happened, In Parallel ensures it lands somewhere.

In short

tl;dv suits sales teams that need video recordings, timestamped clips, CRM updates and call coaching. tl;dv builds a searchable meeting library, while In Parallel records no video and instead turns decisions, owners and risks into a shared record with sources, so cross-functional teams that need meeting decisions to reach every team and AI tool should choose In Parallel.

Updated

Capability
In Parallel
tl;dv
Meeting capture
Yes
Yes (video)
Decision record with status
Yes
No
Where outcomes go
Shared record, readable over MCP
CRM push
Decision extraction
Yes
AI highlights
Cross-meeting intelligence
Yes
No
Video recording
No
Yes

In Parallel isn't another meeting or project tool — it's the AI context layer: it gives the AI you already use your team's decisions, with the source behind every answer. Choosing an AI context layer →

What are the key differences?

From recording to coordination.

From video clips to execution signals

tl;dv lets you clip and share key video moments from meetings, useful for sales coaching, async updates, and knowledge sharing. In Parallel extracts execution signals: decisions, ownership, risks, commitments. It keeps them as a record with owners and status. One helps you review the meeting. The other advances the work.

From meeting library to current record

tl;dv builds a searchable library of your meetings with AI-generated summaries. In Parallel builds a current record. Each meeting adds decisions, owners and risks to it, and the workspace pages it touched are updated afterwards. The library remembers the past. The record shapes what happens next.

From sales-focused to cross-functional

tl;dv has strong CRM integrations and is optimized for sales workflows, deal intelligence, call coaching, pipeline updates. In Parallel is built for cross-functional coordination: program managers, engineering leads, and executives who need decisions from meetings to reach every team.

When to choose tl;dv

  • You need video recordings with timestamped clips
  • Your primary use case is sales call recording and CRM updates
  • You want a meeting library with AI-powered search
  • Meeting coaching and training are a priority

When to choose In Parallel

  • You need meeting decisions kept as a record with owners and status
  • Cross-functional coordination is the bottleneck, not individual meetings
  • You want Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot to answer from what your meetings decided
  • Managers spend hours manually reconciling meeting decisions with project tools

Frequently asked questions

Can In Parallel replace tl;dv for meeting recording?

Yes. In Parallel captures meeting conversations and extracts decisions, action items, and ownership, similar to tl;dv. But it goes further by keeping those signals in a shared record across meetings and teams.

Does In Parallel support video recording like tl;dv?

In Parallel focuses on capturing what matters for execution, decisions, risks, commitments, and ownership changes, rather than video recordings. If you need timestamped video clips for sharing or training purposes, tl;dv is purpose-built for that. If you need a record of what your meetings decided, In Parallel is the better fit.

How do the plans compare?

tl;dv offers a free tier with video recording and basic AI notes. In Parallel offers the full workspace from €29 / user / month, billed monthly with no commitment: Notes with structured decision and commitment extraction, plus workspace pages that update after each meeting and MCP access for your AI tools.

Which is better for sales teams?

tl;dv has strong CRM integrations for sales workflows, call recording, deal tracking, and coaching. In Parallel is built for cross-functional coordination: program managers, engineering leads, and executives who need meeting outcomes kept in one record across multiple teams.

Price the knowledge, not the people.

41% of the work week goes to coordination. In Parallel gives it back.

Plans

Professional

€29

per user / month

120 Knowledge Units per user a day. For teams under 50 users: meeting notes, chat, pages and workspaces.

Business

€69

per user / month

250 Knowledge Units per user a day. Adds sharing: give people access to a workspace, with set access rights for what they can see. Up to 5 app integrations. Automations when released.

Enterprise

Custom

One annual price, invoiced in advance. From 50 users, everyone in the company on one contract: unlimited app integrations, SSO and a named contact.

Talk to sales →

On request

Custom

Dedicated EU cloud, on-premises and professional services

Shared EU cloud is standard and included. Onboarding, trainings and the named contact are always included.

Talk to sales →
  • Billed monthly at list price, cancel any month — or prepay a year and save 20%.
  • One plan for the whole company: moving up moves everyone. Every user who signs in has a seat, including clients added to a workspace; AI agents need none.
  • Reads from your own AI tools over MCP are free within fair use. When the pool runs out, 1,000 KU top-ups for €250 are added automatically, up to a cap your admin sets.
See full pricing

Go beyond recording.

Get started with the AI notetaker. See how In Parallel turns meetings into execution. 30-minute demo.