Intelligence for what your dashboards can’t see.

The honest picture of how your company runs.

Board packs are written by the people being evaluated. Your best signals are buried in meetings nobody reviewed. In Parallel listens to everything, scores what it finds, and gives you a clear picture of how your organisation is actually running — in under 48 hours, and every week after that. From every meeting, not just the ones you attend.

In Parallel Diagnostics

The plan is clear on paper. What’s happening in the meetings that move it forward has been impossible to see — until now.

Your dashboards show what happened. Your meetings reveal why — and what’s about to happen. Twenty diagnostics score every meeting across organisational health and sales operations, each one traced back to transcript evidence. What a consultancy takes twelve weeks to produce, you get in 48 hours. And every week after.

20

ready-made diagnostics

0–100

scored from evidence

GDPR

compliant by design

<48h

to intelligence

How it works

Four steps. Zero surveys. Continuous intelligence.

01

Record

Our meeting bot joins your Zoom, Teams, or Meet calls automatically. No hardware. No special setup. Your team meets as usual.

02

Extract

AI extracts 9 structured signal types from every transcript: decisions, action items, risks, dependencies, escalations, opportunities, and more.

03

Diagnose

Every meeting is scored across 20 diagnostics in two domains. Each score includes confidence levels, severity ratings, evidence from the transcript, and recommended actions — that a human always decides on.

04

Track

Individual meeting scores are useful. But the longitudinal view is where intelligence emerges. Track how scores change over weeks and months. Detect escalation curves and structural patterns before they become crises.

The execution blind spot

You’re governing by narrative, not by evidence.

Organisations make critical decisions based on three sources: board packs curated by the people being evaluated, engagement surveys that are self-reported and infrequent, and gut feel that is subjective and unscalable.

Board packs

Curated fiction

Optimised for optics, not truth. Written by the people being evaluated.

Employee surveys

Self-reported sentiment

Politically filtered, 12 months stale by the time they’re acted on.

Consultant interviews

Performed narrative

€200–500k, 6–12 weeks, and people perform for the interviewer.

Your direct experience

3–4 meetings per week

Out of 300+ happening across your organisation. You’re governing from a sample size of 1%.

Meanwhile, the truth about how your organisation actually operates lives in thousands of meeting hours that nobody analyses. The data was always there. Nobody was listening.

20 diagnostics + custom

Two domains. Twenty diagnostics. Scored from evidence.

Each diagnostic measures 5–8 independent dimensions, scored 0–100 with interpretive bands. Every finding traces back to specific evidence in specific meetings.

Strategic Focus

Is your strategy actually driving daily decisions?

What it catches

Teams executing brilliantly on the wrong things. Strategy documents that exist but never enter the meeting room.

Decision Quality

Are decisions made with data, ownership, and timelines?

What it catches

Decisions avoided, made without data, or made by the wrong person. Meetings that feel productive but produce no actual decisions.

Team Health

Is the team psychologically safe and dynamically balanced?

What it catches

Silent disengagement, dominant voice patterns, eroding trust. The dynamics that engagement surveys miss because people self-censor.

Pipeline Health

Is the pipeline real, balanced, and moving?

What it catches

Stale deals inflating pipeline. Stage distribution that guarantees a miss next quarter.

See all 20 diagnostics

2 domains · 20 lenses · custom available

Proof case

I didn’t know our strategic framework was never referenced in any meeting. I assumed it was happening.”

CEO

PE-backed industrial scale-up

A PE-backed industrial scale-up engaged In Parallel to analyse 4 months of meeting recordings across every function: board, management, sales, marketing, operations, R&D, and CEO direct reports. 100+ meetings. Every team. 20 diagnostics. One truth.

0%

of meetings referenced the strategic framework — Strategy existed on paper only. Not one team in any scope mentioned the declared strategic priorities. Not once.

8 / 100

Partner Channel Commitment score — Compensation structurally incentivised direct sales. Every salesperson was rationally undermining the declared strategy.

83%

customer installation problem rate — A quality crisis escalated invisibly across 8 weeks. Each meeting treated it as new information.

100%

of scopes had CEO as named dependency — The CEO appeared as owner, decision-maker, or critical dependency in every organisational scope simultaneously.

<48h

Time to produce this analysis — A traditional consulting diagnostic covering this scope would take 6–12 weeks and €150–300k.

Pricing

Diagnostics is a professional service add-on.

20-diagnostic execution health scoring across Organisational Health and Sales Operations. Run quarterly or monthly to track progress over time.

Diagnostics Run

Recommended quarterly or monthly

€15,000

per run

  • 20-diagnostic scoring (0–100) with trend tracking
  • Note-takers provided for data collection
  • In Parallel methodology
Talk to us

Strategy Validation

One-time engagement

€15–25K

one-time

  • Strategy document + 50–200 meeting recordings
  • Evidence-based verdict in 48 hours
  • Includes diagnostic run + deliverable report
Talk to us

Workspace pricing (Notes free, Plans from €69/workspace/month) is separate and not required to run Diagnostics.

The methodology

Continuous behavioural diagnostics from organisational conversations.

Our framework draws on three established research traditions: discourse analysis in organisations, sensemaking theory, and behavioural strategy. The analytical chain follows a structured progression from raw transcript to strategic recommendations — with every recommendation surfaced for human decision, never automated.

Signal extraction pipeline

Raw Transcript Signal Extraction(9 types) Dimensional Scoring(5–8 per lens) Composite Scores(0–100) Longitudinal Patterns

The full methodology

Scoring calibration, signal taxonomy, dimensional weighting, and the research foundations behind every lens — in one document.

Built on discourse analysis (Fairclough, 2003), sensemaking theory (Weick, 1995), and behavioural strategy (Powell et al., 2011).

Download the whitepaper

Questions we hear

Frequently asked questions.

How do you handle privacy and data sensitivity?

GDPR-compliant by design. All meeting participants are notified that the meeting is being recorded. Diagnostic reporting is at the team/scope level, not individual level. Data is processed and stored in the EU. You control data retention and can delete data at any time. We provide a full Data Processing Agreement (DPA). Our Responsible AI framework ensures recommendations are always surfaced for human decision — never automated.

What about meetings in Finnish, German, or other languages?

Our transcription supports 50+ languages. The diagnostic lenses are currently optimised for English, Finnish, German, and Swedish. Multilingual meetings — where participants switch between languages — are handled natively.

How accurate are the diagnostics?

Each diagnostic finding includes a confidence level (high, medium, low) and the specific evidence from the transcript that supports it. We do not report low-confidence findings as high-severity.

Will my team feel like they are being surveilled?

We position Diagnostics as a meeting quality and organisational health tool, not a performance monitoring tool. Diagnostics score meetings, not people. The most common team reaction is curiosity, not resistance.

How is this different from Otter, Fireflies, or other meeting tools?

Transcription is a commodity. Those tools tell you what was said. Diagnostics tells you what it means for your organisation’s health. Twenty behavioural diagnostics across two domains, longitudinal tracking, and cross-scope pattern detection are capabilities that no transcription tool offers.

How long does the initial diagnostic take?

For the Strategy Validation Package (analysing existing recordings), we typically deliver findings within 48 hours of receiving access to meeting data. Our proof case analysis of 100+ meetings across every organisational scope was produced in under 24 hours.

What meeting platforms do you support?

Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. Our meeting bot joins scheduled meetings automatically — no special hardware or setup required.

What if we don’t have historical recordings?

No problem. We start recording from day one and begin delivering diagnostics within 2–4 weeks as meeting data accumulates. The longitudinal intelligence becomes more valuable with each passing week.

Three steps. Two weeks.
One pilot team.

Share your meeting recordings. We run all 20 diagnostics on your meetings. You see real scores on real evidence — in 48 hours. Then decide if you want it running continuously.

No commitment. No integration needed. No IT project.