In Parallel vs Loom, Async Video vs a Shared Decision Record

Jämför med

Loom logo

Loom

Loom turns meetings and updates into async video. In Parallel turns them into a shared record of decisions, owners and risks.

Where Loom records the context, In Parallel captures the decisions -- and keeps everyone aligned on what happens next.

Funktion
In Parallel
Loom
Meeting capture
Yes (auto)
Async video recording
Pages updated after meetings
Yes, by the page agent
None
Decisions & action items
Captured automatically
Watch the video
Decision status
Proposed, reviewing, approved, rejected
Not tracked
Tool ecosystem
Tool-agnostic
Atlassian / Jira-centric
Target user
Managers & executives
Distributed teams

In Parallel isn't another meeting or project tool — it's the AI context layer: it gives the AI you already use your team's decisions, with the source behind every answer. Choosing an AI context layer →

Vilka är de viktigaste skillnaderna?

From recorded context to a shared decision record.

From async video to a shared decision record

Loom is excellent at replacing a meeting or an email with a short, watchable video. But the decisions and action items inside that video still live in the video -- someone has to watch it, take notes, and update the plan. In Parallel captures the decisions automatically and keeps them as a shared record, with an owner, a status and a link to the meeting.

From watching to knowing what changed

With Loom, staying current means watching recordings. The more your team relies on async video, the more there is to watch. In Parallel reads the meeting for you -- surfacing what was decided, who owns it, and what shifted -- so you see the change without watching the footage.

From Atlassian-centric to tool-agnostic coordination

Loom is now part of Atlassian and integrates most deeply with Jira. In Parallel is tool-agnostic by design -- it keeps one record of decisions whatever tools your teams actually use, and serves it to any MCP-capable AI tool, without assuming the rest of your stack lives inside one vendor's ecosystem.

From communication to execution intelligence

Loom makes communication asynchronous and clear. In Parallel makes execution visible. It is less about how you share an update and more about whether the work behind that update is on track -- captured from meetings, kept as a record with owners and status, and reflected on the workspace pages it touches.

När du ska välja Loom

  • Async video is the best way to share updates and walkthroughs on your team
  • You need screen recordings for documentation, support, or sales outreach
  • Your stack is centred on Atlassian and Jira
  • One-to-many communication matters more than execution tracking

När du ska välja In Parallel

  • You need decisions and action items captured automatically, not buried in video
  • You want a record of decisions and owners that stays current without manual upkeep
  • Managers and executives need real-time visibility into whether work is on track
  • Your teams use tools from multiple vendors, not just the Atlassian ecosystem

Vanliga frågor

Does In Parallel replace Loom?

Not exactly -- they do different jobs. Loom is for recording and sharing async video. In Parallel is for capturing the decisions and action items from your meetings and keeping them as a shared record. Many teams use Loom for communication and In Parallel for coordination.

Loom is part of Atlassian now -- how is In Parallel different from that ecosystem?

Loom gives Atlassian an async-video building block alongside Jira and Confluence. In Parallel is the intelligence layer on top: it captures decisions from meetings, keeps one shared record of decisions, and works across tools -- not just within Atlassian. See our In Parallel vs Atlassian comparison for the full ecosystem view.

Can In Parallel capture decisions from meetings the way Loom captures video?

Yes -- that is its core job. In Parallel joins your meetings, captures decisions and action items, and keeps them as a shared record, updating the workspace pages the meeting touched. Instead of a recording you have to rewatch, you get a structured, current view of what was decided and what happens next.

Does In Parallel work with Jira like Loom does?

In Parallel works alongside Jira rather than inside it, and it is tool-agnostic: it captures decisions from the meetings where work is discussed, whatever tool tracks the tickets, and the Business plan includes up to five app integrations. You are not limited to the Atlassian ecosystem to get value from it.

Prissätt kunskapen, inte människorna.

41% av arbetsveckan går åt till koordinering. In Parallel ger den tillbaka.

Planer

Professional

€29

per användare / månad

120 Knowledge Units per användare och dag. För team med färre än 50 användare: mötesanteckningar, chatt, sidor och arbetsytor.

Business

€69

per användare / månad

250 Knowledge Units per användare och dag. Lägger till delning: ge personer åtkomst till en arbetsyta, med angivna behörigheter för vad de kan se. Upp till 5 appintegrationer. Automatiseringar när de släpps.

Enterprise

Anpassat

Ett årspris, fakturerat i förskott. Från 50 användare, hela företaget på ett avtal: obegränsat med appintegrationer, SSO och en namngiven kontaktperson.

Prata med sälj →

På begäran

Anpassat

Dedikerat EU-moln, on-premises och konsulttjänster

Delat EU-moln är standard och ingår. Onboarding, utbildningar och den namngivna kontaktpersonen ingår alltid.

Prata med sälj →
  • Faktureras månadsvis till listpris, uppsägningsbart varje månad — eller betala ett år i förskott och spara 20 %.
  • En plan för hela företaget: uppgraderar ni, gäller det alla. Varje användare som loggar in har en plats, även kunder som läggs till i en arbetsyta; AI-agenter behöver ingen.
  • Frågor från era egna AI-verktyg via MCP är gratis inom skälig användning. När poolen tar slut läggs påfyllningar på 1 000 KU för 250 € till automatiskt, upp till ett tak som er administratör sätter.
Se hela prislistan

Capture the decision, not just the video.

See how In Parallel turns every meeting into a shared decision record. 30-minute demo.